Wang Yan (Dazhong Daily): It seems that professional titles for farmers are a form of social progress, but what is the tangible significance of the titles to farmers?

Some government departments may argue that the system can offer opportunities to those who want to have professional titles, but in my opinion, few farmers would like to have a virtual title that will bring them no tangible benefits. Instead of the titles, farmers need preferential policies, technical training and equal opportunities to function in a competitive society.

Moreover, it is still unclear if farmers will be required to pay for their professional titles. To my knowledge, few would be willing to exchange hundreds of yuan, which could otherwise buy fertilizers and seeds, for a worthless certificate.

To promote rural development we need a large number of agricultural technicians who come from the farming ranks, but it's absolutely unnecessary to label them with titles such as agronomist. The government should offer more tangible help rather than offering examinations for professional titles.

Xu Xin (Liaoning Daily): In cities, professional titles are useful as they prove a person's competence and in some cases mean economic benefits. However, as far as farmers are concerned, professional titles may not be so attractive. This is because even if a farmer enjoys the title of senior agronomist, the title cannot ensure him an annual income higher than others'.

It's right to value human resources in the agricultural sector and the proposal of granting farmers professional titles is a good one. However, in the current situation, to give them certain titles alone does not suffice, as there must be more tangible awards. For example, those who have received the titles should be offered opportunities to have further agricultural training. Equipped with improved skills, they are able to make more money, which will mean better living conditions, and also serve as a good example for fellow villagers.